Washington v. State
Washington v. State
744 So. 2d 1021; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9691; 1997 WL 530348
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Washington v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
I agree with the majority’s per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s denial of Washington’s motion for relief under rule 3.850; however, I would affirm without prejudice to appellant’s filing a new 3.850 motion, properly sworn, as to his unsworn allegation he was without knowledge of the state’s intent to habitualize him at the time he entered his plea.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.