Taramona v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ramdamar v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Rodriguez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Cifuentes v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- Bingham v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Jesus Daniel TARAMONA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jesus Daniel Taramona, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking the appellant's probation but remand for the trial court to reduce its reasons and the evidence relied upon for the revocation to writing in accordance with the court's oral pronouncement. See Salvatierra v. State, 691 So.2d 32, 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784, 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473, 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). As this will be purely a ministerial act, we deem the appellant's presence to be unnecessary. See Culliver v. State, 693 So.2d 1152, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Boggs v. State, 557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796, 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.