Rogers v. State
Rogers v. State
704 So. 2d 1147; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 903; 1998 WL 39548
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rogers v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, the judgment erroneously indicates that appellant pled nolo contendere to two counts of sale or delivery of cocaine near a school and two counts of possession of cocaine. We remand to correct the judgment to reflect that appellant was adjudicated guilty as a result of a jury verdict.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.