Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

Rodwin-Pines v. Pines
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 11, 1998 · Goderich, Nesbitt, Schwartz
706 So. 2d 946; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2294; 1998 WL 103750 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rodwin-Pines v. Pines

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.