Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Wright v. State

Wright v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 18, 1998 · Barfield, Lawrence, Wolf
706 So. 2d 952; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2703; 1998 WL 115851 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wright v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s arguments challenging his conviction. Appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in not conforming the written judgment of conviction and sentence to the oral pronouncement of sentence was not properly preserved for appeal. See Davis v. State, 704 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).1 We, therefore, affirm.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

. We do not accept the state’s concession as to this issue since the failure to preserve this issue for appeal appears clearly on the record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑