Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Palacios v. State

Palacios v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 25, 1998 · Goderich, Nesbitt, Schwartz
706 So. 2d 1382; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916; 1998 WL 131222 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Palacios v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed. See Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Anderson v. State, 624 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Griffin v. State, 603 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Harris v. State, 610 So.2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); § 784.045(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). We remand, however, for entry of a written order specifically listing the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated, as no such order appears in the record. See, et., *1383Bryant v. State, 686 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed, but remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.