Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Farrior v. State

Farrior v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 9, 1998 · Altenbernd, Frank, Patterson
707 So. 2d 777; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 67; 1998 WL 97481 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Farrior v. State

Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

Reggie Farrior appeals from his judgment and sentence for handling and fondling a child under sixteen years of age. We affirm the judgment and sentence, but strike that portion of probation condition (12) requiring Farrior to pay for drug testing because it was not pronounced orally at sentencing. See Tremaine v. State, 698 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We do not strike probation condition (4) because it did not require oral pronouncement. See Houston v. State, 701 So.2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.