C.O. v. State
C.O. v. State
707 So. 2d 926; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2272; 1998 WL 113577
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
C.O. v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction for loitering and prowling. See State v. Ecker, 311 So.2d 104, 110 (Fla. 1975); In re A.R., 460 So.2d 1024, 1024-25 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
However, the trial court’s adjudication of appellant’s delinquency was rendered without consideration of a predisposition report. See State v. Berry, 647 So.2d 830, 832 (Fla. 1994); Harris v. State, 633 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Moreover, there is an absence of specific findings. § 39.052(4)(e)l, Fla.Stat. (1995); J.M. v. State, 692 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); M.C. v. State, 687 So.2d 832, 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication and remand.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.