Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Whiters v. State

Whiters v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 18, 1998 · Glickstein, Polen, Stone
707 So. 2d 944; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662; 1998 WL 191155 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Whiters v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant has not shown that the actual sentence he received was “illegal” under rule 3.800(a), we affirm the denial of his unverified motion to correct illegal sentence, but without prejudice to his right to file a timely and verified motion under rule 3.850, raising the claims for credit made here.

STONE, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.