Card v. State
Card v. State
708 So. 2d 353; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4315; 1998 WL 186832
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Card v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm on the issue of appellant’s re-sentencing. However, the judgments of conviction entered pursuant to the resentencing on April 24,1997 must be stricken, since they duplicate the offenses contained in the original judgment. To indicate that there has not been resentencing for new offenses, the trial court should enter an amended judgment dating back to the date of the original judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.