Montalban v. State
Montalban v. State
709 So. 2d 1386; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5888
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Montalban v. State
Opinion of the Court
Arquimendes Montalban, Enrique Mendez, Rolando Gonzalez and Antonio Rodriguez appeal their convictions and sentences for burglary with assault or battery without a firearm, three counts of false imprisonment and one count of petty theft. We affirm.
After careful consideration, we find that the appellants’ contentions regarding the use of hearsay exceptions, the denial of preemp-tory challenges, and the content of the prosecutor’s closing argument do not constitute reversible error. Even if error occurred it was harmless in nature. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.