Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Phillips v. Koepke

Phillips v. Koepke
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 3, 1998 · Owen, Polen, Stevenson, William
710 So. 2d 772; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8841; 1998 WL 281747 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Phillips v. Koepke

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendants in a medical malpractice case seek certiorari review of an order denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the mandatory presuit requirements, specifically that the verified medical opinion was not from a medical expert as defined by section 766.202(5) Florida Statutes. We deny certio-rari because it is clear that the court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in determining that the affiant’s qualifications met the alternative definition of a *773medical expert. See Fort Walton Beach Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Dingier, 697 So.2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.