Hicks v. Chamberlin
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lorraine Campbell and Charles Lamm v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Bailey v. Bailey (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Tsiperfal v. Ohio Savings Securities, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set a hearing on his motion to dissolve a temporary ex parte injunction. We grant the petition.
The petition recites petitioner’s substantial efforts in the trial court throughout February to have a hearing set on his two applications for same before filing the present petition to seek relief.
The amended response does not dispute petitioner’s entitlement to a hearing on his motion within five days of the application as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.610(d).
Accordingly, we direct the trial court to set a hearing date within five days of the issuance of this opinion. A rehearing will not be entertained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.