R.H. v. State
R.H. v. State
711 So. 2d 647; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7595; 1998 WL 335980
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
R.H. v. State
Opinion of the Court
There was evidence from which the trier of fact could conclude that appellant was guilty of burglarizing a vehicle which at the time was occupied, according to appellant’s own testimony, by a person unknown to the appellant. Therefore a conviction for burglary of an occupied conveyance, pursuant to section 810.02(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1997) was appropriate.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.