R.H. v. State
R.H. v. State
711 So. 2d 647; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7595; 1998 WL 335980
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
There was evidence from which the trier of fact could conclude that appellant was guilty of burglarizing a vehicle which at the time was occupied, according to appellant’s own testimony, by a person unknown to the appellant. Therefore a conviction for burglary of an occupied conveyance, pursuant to section 810.02(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1997) was appropriate.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.