Demola v. Metropolitan Dade County
Demola v. Metropolitan Dade County
713 So. 2d 1118; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9573; 1998 WL 422312
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Demola v. Metropolitan Dade County
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ., concur.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because appellant was acting consistently with advice given by counsel, see Chery v. Flagship Airlines, Inc., 692 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), I do not believe that he can be viewed as guilty of “misconduct” for purposes of the unemployment compensation law. See Hummer v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 573 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.