Slizyk v. Smilack
Slizyk v. Smilack
716 So. 2d 288; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180; 1998 WL 380494
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Slizyk v. Smilack
Opinion of the Court
We conclude that as to all appealed orders, save two, there is either no jurisdiction to review them or the claim of error was not preserved by timely objection below. As for the order terminating temporary alimony and the order denying temporary suit money, although there is conflicting evidence concerning the husband’s financial condition, the
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.