Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Tate v. Singletary

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 15, 1998 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Shevin

716 So. 2d 289; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8483; 1998 WL 390453 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Cardenas v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Williams v. Singletary (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
MacTown, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We grant defendant’s June 18, 1997 petition for belated review of the trial court’s July 21, 1995 order denying his Rule 3.850 motion.1 After conducting an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s motion, the court entered an order that did not advise defendant that he must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of rendition of the order. Fla. R.App. P. 3.850. Defendant is therefore entitled to a belated appeal. See State v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1975). An order of this court shall be filed with the lower tribunal and treated as the notice of appeal in case numbers 92-24145, 92-24639, and 92-23768 in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j)(5)(D).

Petition for belated appeal granted.

. The July 21 order indicates that the court filed the order under case numbers 91-4226, 92-3170, and 92-18869. However, the order reveals that it addressed a motion filed under case numbers 92-24145, 92-24639, and 92-23768.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.