Lorenzana v. State
Lorenzana v. State
717 So. 2d 119; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455; 1998 WL 567970
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lorenzana v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant claims error in resentencing when the court imposed restitution as part of his sentence for the first time on remand. However, appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Thus, the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.