Cleveland v. State
Cleveland v. State
Opinion of the Court
Cleveland appeals from his judgment and sentences for carrying a concealed firearm,
Rule 3.703(d)(10) provides that 25 points should be added to a defendant’s guidelines scoresheet if the defendant is convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony other than certain enumerated offenses in section 775.087(3) (none of which are involved in this ease), while having in his or her possession a semi-automatic firearm. The Florida Supreme Court recently held that additional points for possessing a firearm while committing a felony or attempting to commit a felony should not be added where the sole underlying crime has as an essential element the carrying or possession of a firearm. Vela v. State, 717 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1998); Coleman v. State, 713 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1998); White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla. 1998).
In this case, Cleveland was convicted of three offenses. One, resisting an officer without violence, is not a crime which has as an essential element the possession of a firearm. Thus, points assessed pursuant to rule 3.703(d)(10) could be added, if Cleveland possessed the weapon during the offense of resisting the officer.
Based on police reports in the record and the state’s summary of the factual basis for the plea at the sentencing hearing, it appears that Cleveland had a weapon concealed in his clothing. When the police officer asked if he would agree to be patted down, he first agreed and then ran from the officer. During the chase, Cleveland threw down a loaded handgun (a .22 caliber semi-automatic firearm), which police officers recovered. Cleveland admitted to the arresting officer that he had the firearm in his right front pocket
AFFIRMED.
. § 790.01(2), Fla. Stat.
. § 790.22(3), Fla. Stat.
.§ 843.02, Fla. Stat.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tracy N. CLEVELAND v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published