L.E.M. v. State
L.E.M. v. State
719 So. 2d 381; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426; 1998 WL 765019
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
L.E.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); A.S. v. State, 693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. D.T.W., 425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.