Barfield v. State
Barfield v. State
719 So. 2d 1010; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13882; 1998 WL 765363
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Barfield v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s judgments of conviction for burglary and petit theft in all respects but remand for correction of the judgments to reflect that appellant was found guilty of these offenses following a jury trial, rather than a guilty plea, and that his petit theft conviction is a second degree misdemeanor.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of judgments.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.