Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

A.D. v. State

A.D. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 18, 1998 · Dell, Shahood, Stevenson
720 So. 2d 318; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14720; 1998 WL 796636 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

A.D. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt for grand theft of an automobile and use or possession of drug paraphernalia. However, appellant contends, and the State concedes, *319that the trial court erred when it entered a single disposition order covering both offenses. “The law is clear that separate disposition orders must be entered for each offense adjudicated.” M.L.B. v. State, 673 So.2d 582, 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter separate disposition orders for each offense.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED.

DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ. concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.