Janney v. State
Janney v. State
723 So. 2d 361; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15982; 1998 WL 889241
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Janney v. State
Opinion of the Court
George Janney challenges the order of restitution entered after he pleaded guilty to a charge of dealing in stolen property. Some of the arguments Janney advances in this appeal were not presented to the trial court. “It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.” See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992). Furthermore, the evidence presented at the restitution hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s order. Therefore, we affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.