Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Firn v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Firn v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 18, 1998 · Fulmer, Northcutt, Whatley
725 So. 2d 1177; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15899; 1998 WL 879128 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Firn v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, James and Mildred Firn challenge the trial court’s determination that James Firn is not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage. The relevant facts underlying the trial court’s final judgment are set forth in its order granting the motion for *1178summary judgment filed by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that under the terms of the insurance policy at issue in this case, James Firn was not an insured for basic liability coverage and is, therefore, not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage. Accordingly, we affirm.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.