Burns v. Hacker
Burns v. Hacker
729 So. 2d 398; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12969; 1998 WL 880951
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Burns v. Hacker
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellant has moved for rehearing. We consider his motion as one for clarification and say that the trial court correctly ruled that it was without jurisdiction to consider his claim because it did not meet the jurisdictional amount threshold of $15,000. Therefore, appellant must file his claim in county court. The motion for rehearing is otherwise denied.
MOTION GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.
GRIFFIN, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.