Brown v. State
Brown v. State
735 So. 2d 496; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13439; 1998 WL 729689
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brown v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant challenges the dismissal of his postconviction motion as untimely. The state concedes and we agree that appellant’s motion was timely filed under the mailbox rule, see Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1992), and therefore appellant is entitled to have his motion considered on the merits. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.