Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Baldwin v. State

Baldwin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 3, 1998 · Davis, Lawrence, Mickle
742 So. 2d 803; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6145; 1998 WL 282767 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Baldwin v. State

Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE, Judge.

Peter G. Baldwin (Baldwin) appeals his judgments and sentences for (1) committing a lewd and lascivious act by an act defined as sexual battery, but not constituting the crime of sexual battery, and (2) lewd and lascivious assault upon a child under 16 years of age. We affirm Baldwin’s convictions. However, we remand for resentencing. As the State concedes, Baldwin was not afforded conflict-free representation during the sentencing phase of the instant case. Following his trial and prior to sentencing, Baldwin moved for discharge and replacement of his counsel. Baldwin’s counsel also moved to withdraw, citing conflicts that had arisen with regard to further representation. Although the trial court allowed Baldwin’s counsel to withdraw in a pending companion case, he was not permitted to withdraw in the instant case. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing with appointment of conflict-free counsel. We affirm in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.