Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1998

Rowe v. City of Clearwater

Rowe v. City of Clearwater
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 9, 1998 · Booth, Ervin, Nortwick
755 So. 2d 137; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408; 1998 WL 568072 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rowe v. City of Clearwater

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. Acker v. City of Clearwater, 755 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We certify the following question:

WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.