Rowe v. City of Clearwater
Rowe v. City of Clearwater
755 So. 2d 137; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408; 1998 WL 568072
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Clearwater v. Acker (Fla. 1999)
- HRS DIST. II v. Pickard (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
REVERSED. Acker v. City of Clearwater, 755 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We certify the following question:
WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.