Aleman v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kelly v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Dunn v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Manning v. STATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Oscar A. ALEMAN, Appellant,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Carlos Iglesias, M.D., P.A., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oscar A. Aleman, in proper person.
John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Because the record is susceptible only to the conclusion that the appellant left his previous employment because of a lack of available work which amounted to "good cause attributable to [the] employer," LeCroy v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 654 So.2d 1054, 1056 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), and cases cited, the denial of unemployment compensation benefits is reversed with directions to afford him the full amount of benefits claimed. See Savage v. Macy's East, Inc., 708 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.