Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Dixon v. State

Dixon v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 26, 1999 · Per Curiam
763 So. 2d 1050; 1999 WL 333305 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dixon v. State

Opinion

763 So.2d 1050 (1999)

Henry Lee DIXON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 99-1489.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 26, 1999.

Henry Lee Dixon, Starke, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), which argues that his 30-year habitual offender sentence is illegal. Appellant previously challenged the legality of this sentence, on the same grounds, in 1983, 1987, 1989, and 1992. Consistent with Rivera v. State, 728 So.2d 1165, 1166 (Fla. 1998), and Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), we hereby prohibit appellant from any future filings concerning issues that were or should have been raised in prior postconviction proceedings. We also caution appellant that if he violates this prohibition, he will face additional sanctions.

STONE, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.