Marshall v. State
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Valdes v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Williams v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Jones v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Scruggs v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Cazeau v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Levan v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Venero v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Gonzalez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Bunch v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Anthony MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Anthony Marshall, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
That portion of the order below denying Rule 3.850 relief which upholds the constitutionality of the "Gort Act" is affirmed on the authority of Spann v. State, 719 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Elliard v. State, 714 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Holloway v. State, 712 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and *924 Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Contra Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998). None of the other issues raised by the defendant merit reversal or discussion.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.