In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State, 725 So. 2d 466 (1999)
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369; 1999 WL 77751
Benton, Nortwick, Padovano

In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the entry of separate commitment orders, one for each offense, see A.F. v. State, 718 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and direct that the commitment order for the offense of battery must not exceed one year, see M.J.P. v. State, — So.2d -, 22 Fla.L. Weekly D2090, 1997 WL 536011 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3, 1997), approved 717 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1998); C.P. v. State, 674 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); T.G. v. State, 677 So.2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Interest of T.D.J., a child v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published