Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

In the Interest of T.D.J. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 12, 1999 · Benton, Nortwick, Padovano

725 So. 2d 466; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369; 1999 WL 77751 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

DP v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
D.P. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for the entry of separate commitment orders, one for each offense, see A.F. v. State, 718 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and direct that the commitment order for the offense of battery must not exceed one year, see M.J.P. v. State, — So.2d -, 22 Fla.L. Weekly D2090, 1997 WL 536011 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3, 1997), approved 717 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1998); C.P. v. State, 674 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); T.G. v. State, 677 So.2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.