Chester v. State
Chester v. State
725 So. 2d 1274; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1435; 1999 WL 72193
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Chester v. State
Opinion of the Court
After careful consideration of the well-presented arguments to the contrary, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s disal-lowance of a defense peremptory challenge. Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.