Cianfrani v. State
Cianfrani v. State
728 So. 2d 323; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168; 1999 WL 95279
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cianfrani v. State
Opinion of the Court
James Cianfrani appeals his conviction for felony criminal mischief. Because the State failed to present admissible evidence to support the finding that Cianfrani caused over $1,000 in damage, we reverse. See R.A.P. v. State, 575 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The evidence supports a conviction for first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions to enter a conviction based upon first-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.