Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Barton v. State

Barton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 12, 1999 · Barfield, Nortwick, Padovano
728 So. 2d 340; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2676; 1999 WL 129467 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Barton v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion. However, we reverse that part of the order which imposes sanctions barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this ease and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.