State v. Siddal
State v. Siddal
728 So. 2d 363; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3428; 1999 WL 157087
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Siddal
Opinion of the Court
Although we understand the trial court’s intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State’s position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for resentenc-ing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.