Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Rocco v. Singletary

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 1999 · Fletcher, Nesbitt, Shevin

729 So. 2d 508; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4615; 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 882 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

5500 North Corp. v. Willis (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s proper confession of error, we grant defendant a belated appeal. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). As the state concedes, defendant’s sentence is not in accord with the plea agreement; the court imposed consecutive rather than concurrent sentences in case number 93-15639. We, therefore, vacate defendant’s sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence defendant pursuant to the plea agreement to concurrent sentences on counts one and two in ease number 93-15639. The sentence imposed in that case is to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in case number 92-12917.

Habeas granted; sentence vacated; cause remanded for resentencing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.