Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Domato

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Domato, 730 So. 2d 343 (1999)
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2566; 1999 WL 123770
Cope, Goderich, Nesbitt

Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Domato

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Allstate appeals an order granting class certification in the breach of contract suit filed by its insured, Carlos Domato. Doma-to, the putative class representative, alleged that Allstáte habitually withdraws PIP coverage from its insureds without first obtaining an independent medical examination (IME) showing that the claimed medical costs, being challenged by Allstate, were unreasonable or unnecessary. We find that Domato is an improper class representative, as his claim against Allstate is atypical of the class he purports to represent. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.220(a); Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario, 683 So.2d 641, 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Unrefuted evidence showed that Allstate did arrange an IME for Domato, but Domato refused to attend the IME. Therefore, Domato has no commonality of interest with a putative class whose complaint, in part, would be that Allstate refused its benefits without an IME. We reverse. Domato’s motion for attorney’s fees is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. Carlos Alberto DOMATO
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published