Lambert v. State
Lambert v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer, challenges his conviction. Because we conclude that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the necessarily lesser included offense of battery, we reverse.
In State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla. 1986), the Florida Supreme Court held that “[t]he trial judge has no discretion in whether to instruct the jury on a necessarily lesser included offense. Once the judge determines that the offense is a necessarily lesser included offense, an instruction must be given.” Id. at 932. Although the State maintains
Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.