Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Hooks v. State

Hooks v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 27, 1999 · Barfield, Booth, Wolf
730 So. 2d 424; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317; 1999 WL 242394 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hooks v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s sentences and the imposition of a public defender’s lien based on our opinion in Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and certify the question certified in that case: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.