We find no legal or factual basis for the order under review which, in effect, relieved the appellees of the duty to arbitrate the parties’ dispute as they had *441agreed. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 533 So.2d 279 (Fla. 1988); Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp., 302 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1974); Medident Constr., Inc. v. Chappell, 632 So.2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Montesino v. Advent Technologies, Inc., 676 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 1996); Public Health Trust v. M.R. Harrison Constr. Corp., 415 So.2d 756 (Fla 3d DCA 1982), pet. for review denied, 427 So.2d 737 (Fla. 1983); Hirschfeld v. Crescent Heights, X, Inc., 707 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Hence, the order is reversed with directions to require arbitration.