Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Ramon E. Colina, M.D. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Greisel v. Gregg (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Jonathan Barash seeks review of a temporary injunction to the extent that it enjoined him from competing with PSI Industries. He argues that such relief was not requested. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike that portion of the order as enforcement of the noncompete provision of the confidentiality agreement was not before the trial court. See e.g. Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Dev., Inc., 682 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
We note that Barash also argues that the $1,000.00 bond ordered is inadequate. The trial court may reconsider the amount of bond upon Barash’s filing of an appropriate motion.
Accordingly, we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.