Mendes v. State
Mendes v. State
734 So. 2d 1168; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907; 1999 WL 393671
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mendes v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief as legally insufficient. The motion did not include all the information required by rule 3.850(c). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s refiling an amended motion that complies with the requirements of the rule. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.