We affirm the. denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court was correct in concluding that none of the allegations in the petition stated a claim for habeas relief.

However, the allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and the erroneous score sheet calculations might be proper subjects for post-conviction relief if they were to be raised in a properly sworn motion that complies with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 (1999). Affirmance is therefore without prejudice to the petitioner to file such a motion within the time remaining under that rule. On the record before us, we can make no prediction as to whether either of those claims may have merit.