Mahique v. State
Mahique v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger, 636 So.2d 1321, 1324-25 (Fla. 1994) (holding that to set aside conviction on the basis of newly-discovered evidence, “it must appear that defendant or his counsel could not have known them [asserted facts] by the use of diligence.”); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that defendant abuses the judicial process by filing successive motions “that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions”; and warning defendant that “a prisoner who is
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.