Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Ltd. Partnership

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 13, 1999 · Nesbitt, Shevin, Sorondo

739 So. 2d 733; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218; 1999 WL 729107 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Haynes (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d *734DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1969).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.