Maybusher v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Maybusher v. State, 739 So. 2d 1210 (1999)
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476; 1999 WL 565890
Klein, Polen, Stevenson

Maybusher v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a proper rule 3.800(a) motion.

After some 18 years from appellant’s conviction and sentence, the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion, contending alleged illegality of sentence based on facts appellant must have known at the time of his 1981 sentence, should simply be affirmed.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

POLEN, J.,

concurring specially.

After some 18 years from appellant’s conviction and sentence, the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion, contending alleged illegality of sentence based on facts appellant must have known at the time of his 1981 sentence, should simply be affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ronald MAYBUSHER v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published