Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

McDonald v. State

McDonald v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 25, 1999 · Gross, Shahood, Stevenson
739 So. 2d 1269; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526; 1999 WL 641880 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

McDonald v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s latest motion for postconviction relief, on the ground that the claims are without merit. Additionally, consistent with Rivera v. State, 728 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 1998), and Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1999), we hereby prohibit appellant from filing any pro se petitions or appeals challenging the validity of the trial court’s reasons for imposing a departure sentence and from filing any other pro se petitions or appeals raising claims that have already been presented by appellant and resolved by this court.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.