Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 27, 1999 · Dauksch, Harris, Peterson
741 So. 2d 585; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11629; 1999 WL 651936 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this successive appeal from a denial of a motion to correct a sentence. Because appellant has engaged in frivolous and successive appeals we warn him that if he files another appeal regarding the same issue and conviction that he will be subject to a cancellation of good time credits and other sanctions. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Wareham v. State, 678 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., 686 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑