Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Hoag v. State

Hoag v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 11, 1999 · Davis, Fulmer, Stringer
742 So. 2d 348; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688; 1999 WL 599236 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hoag v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Cindy Hoffman Hoag appeals the summary denial of her request for jail credit, which the trial court treated as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because her motion failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hoag’s ability to file a proper *349rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court which alleges that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1681, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

i

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.